Usefull Application of Cutaneous Uretero-Ileostomy
Gupta J.1, Naidu,
A.2, Kar P.K.3, Bansal A.K. 4 and Gupta K.M. 5
Dept. of Surgery1,
Radio Diagnosis2, Dean3, Community Medicine4, Medicine5, Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (BASTAR) – 494001.
ABSTRACT:
Research question: Cutaneous uretero-ileostomy is useful as an urinary diversion? Material and Method: Experiment was
carried out on five adult healthy dogs weighing ten to sixteen Kgs. of weight in the department of Surgery, Pt. JNM
Medical College, Raipur. Statistical
Analysis: Proportion etc. were
applied as and when required. Observations: Cutaneous ureterostomy the operative procedure on an average lasted
for 3 hours 6 minutes, 80 percent dogs developed cutaneous
ulcers all around the ileostomy stoma. 40 percent
dogs died in the period of observation. On autopsy one dog died of intestinal anastomotic leak while one dog died of urteroileal
leak. In rest of the 3 dogs the diversion was found to be working efficiently. Conclusion: Cutaneous
uretero-ileostomy is the most suitable and
physiologically exceptable method of diversion,
However cutaneous ulcers around stoma and intestinal anastomotic leak has considerably masked the merits of this
method. It carries the least incidence of urinary leakage, stomal
stenosis and ascending urinary tract infection.
KEYWORDS: Urinary leak, Diversion, Social stigma.
INTRODUCTION:
Since 1956’s Bricker’s (1) ileal
conduit has been the most widely used method of supra-vesical
diversion. As it is only a conduit and is incontinent thus require a bag to be
worn to collect the constant flow of urine. However, it has also serious long
term problems such as pyelonephritis, hydronephrosis and calculus formation.
Since its first description by Shoemaker (2) and than
by Seiffert in (3) and its establishment by Bricker
in 1950 as a method of urinary diversion following radical pelvic operations, ureteroileostomy has become a preferred method of urinary
diversion. Although it is a widely accepted with frequent early and late
complication. The main problem with this form of diversion is that the patient
has to wear an external appliance lifelong causing inconvenience and social stigma.
In recent past there have been many series of ileal conduit diversion reporting a wide variation in
complication rates and results. This variation is because of the many factors:
(i) The length of period of follow-up, (ii) The
condition for which diversion was done, (iii) Technical facilities available,
the availability of experienced surgeon, (iv) Intelligence of the patient, (v)
Proper follow-up at frequent intervals and (vi) Finally the preoperative status
of urinary tract. In patients with preoperative dialated
upper tracts the complications are higher.
Keeping in mind the above facts and as very few reports
of such studies are available and in 1957 a study group of World Health
Organization has expressed the view that in order to get a comprehensive
picture of disease more and more studies have to be carried out, Garg Narendra K.(4). This
prompted the authors to undertake this study to assess the impact of bilateral cutaneous ureteroiliostomy as an
urinary diversion.
MATERIAL
AND METHODS:
The present study consisted of an experimental work on
5 adult healthy dogs of both sexes ranging in weight from 10 to 16Kgs. Each dog
were study for the maximum period of 1½ month. Preoperative blood urea, serum
sodium, serum potassium, urinary chloride and urine culture were carried out
for organism. The study was conducted in Pt. J.N.M.Medical
College ,Raipur, in the Deptt. of Surgery.
Preoperative preparation and pre medications were done
as per requirements. A circular area in right iliac fossa,
about 2 cm. in diameter was excised through all layers of abdomen. Then the
abdomen was opened by midline incision and ureters
were isolated.
A loop of ileum not longer than 10-15 cm., with one to
two complete arcades of blood vessels in its mesentery and 10-20 cms. proximal to the ileo-caecal volve, was selected
with its base attached having intact blood supply. Two intestinal clamps were
applied on either sides of the selected loop and the loop was isolated by
cutting between two clamps on both sides. Proper haemostasis
obtained continuity of the bowel was restored by end to end anastomosis
of cut ends in 4 layers by 3/0 silk, keeping the isolated segment of ileum
below. The proximal end of the isolated loop was closed in two layers.
The site for ureteroileal anstomosis was selected for the left ureter,
5 cms. distal to the proximal end of loop and for
right ureter 10 cms. distal
to proximal end of loop, on antinesenteric border.
Both ureters were spatulated.
The intestinal serosa was incised by stab knife at
final site of uretero-intestinal anastomosis.
A circular piece of musculeris and mucosa removed
corresponding to the size of ureter which is tobe implanted. Stay sutures applied to ureter
and a ilial loop. The ureters
were anastomosed to ileum with a single layer of
several interrupted 4/0 chromic catgut sutures, after intubation of ureter with 6 /F infant feeding tube, one end of which was
brought out through open end of isolated ileal loop.
The loop was tacked to the posterior wall of abdominal cavity. The open end of ileal loop with infant feeding tube was brought out through
abdominal stoma. The intestine was anastomosed with
the skin forming averted nipple type stoma. Abdomen was closed in layers after
complete haemostasis.Post operative care and follow
up were carried out as per guide lines.
OBSERVATION:
As shown in (table - I) blood urea level was ranging
between 10 - 22 mgs. /Percent. The value of serum sodium, serum potassium and
urinary chloride ranged between 128 to 135 mEq./L,
3.5 to 4.2 mEq/L, and 6 -12 mg./L respectively. Urine
culture examination was negative for pathogenic organism in 80 percent of dogs.
Culture report of rest of 20 percent dogs revealed E. coli group of organism.
As shown in table – II, it is evident that all dogs
developed urinary tract infection. The infection set in very first
postoperative weel. Only one dog remained sterile
from pathogens in the first week which later on hower
got infection. E. coli was the most prevalent organism. It was present in all
urine samples. All the survival dogs though were initially infected with E. cluisubsequently developed mixed infection, protuse joined E.cli, as an infecting organism.. Table –III
revealed that blood urea, serum sodium, serum potassium, and urinary chloride
level were within normal limits in all the dogs through post operatively
period. Table –IV shows that 60 % dogs survived for the full lengthof the period of observation i.e. 1 ½
months, whereas 40 % of the dogs died in early postoperative period i.e.
within 3 to 6 days.80 % dogs developed ulcer all around cutaneous
stoma. 20% out of 40% dogs died ,intestinal anastomosis
was the cause of death ,as evidenced on post martum examination.Inthe other 20%
dogs died from chemical peritonitis .There was complete ureteoileal anastomosis
disruption of the left ureter.60% survived dogs, no abnormality of upper
urinary tract or uteroileal anastomosis
found on gross examination.
DISCUSSIONS:
The early complications associated with this form of
diversion includes wound infection and dehiscence intestinal obstruction, stenosis of stoma, uraemia, ureteroileal anastomotic leak and
disruption. Faecal fistula, acute pyelonephritis,
septicaemia. The late complications includes pylonephritis, hydronephrosis,calculaus
formation, uraemia and acidosis, intestinal
obstruction and prolapse of stoma etc.
In most of the series stenosis
of stoma is a common complication, which may be because of postoperative scar.
A poorly fitting bag mat lead to hyperkeratosis with scarring due to underlying
inflammation. Cordonnor (2) stated that stomal stenosis is more common in
paediatric age group because of greater sensitivity
of the skin and small size of the ileum. An ill fitting appliance, alkalinity
of urine, neglect and poor hygiene of patient increase the incidence somal stenosis. In a properly
filled appliance the diameter of appliance should not exceed that of the
conduit stoma bt more than 1/8th of an
inch. Otherwise leakage of alkaline urine causes encrustation of the skin while
the acid urine cause skin burn.
Table – I: Preoperative blood Urea, Serum Sodium, Serum
Potassium, Urinary Chloride and Urinary Culture.
Dog No. |
Blood Urea
(mgs%) |
Serum mEg/L |
Urianry
Chloride (gms./L) |
Urine Culture |
|
Sodium |
Potassium |
||||
1 |
10 |
130 |
3.7 |
11 |
Sterile |
2 |
18 |
134 |
3.3 |
9 |
Sterile |
3 |
16 |
135 |
3.5 |
7 |
E. coli. |
4 |
20 |
128 |
3.3 |
12 |
Sterile |
5 |
22 |
130 |
3.5 |
10 |
Sterile |
Table – II: Post Operative Urine Culture
Dog No. |
Post Operative
Urine Culture (Weeks) |
|||||
Fist |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
Fifth |
Sixth |
|
1 |
E. coli. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
2 |
E. coli. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
E. coli. |
E. coli. +
Proteus |
E. coli. |
E. coli. |
E. coli. |
E. coli. +
Proteus |
4 |
Sterile |
E. coli. +
Proteus |
E. coli. |
E. coli. |
E. coli. |
E. coli. +
Proteus |
5 |
E. coli. |
E. coli. |
E. coli. +
Proteus |
E. coli. +
Proteus |
E. coli. |
E. coli. |
Table – III: Postoperative Value of Blood Urea, Serum
Sodium, Serum Potassium, Urinary Chloride
Postoperative |
Blood Urea (gms.%) |
Serum Sodium(mEq/L) |
Serum
Potassium(mEq/L) |
Urinary
Chloride(mEq/L) |
||||||||||||||||
Dog No. |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1st Week |
- |
24 |
18 |
20 |
22 |
- |
134 |
137 |
128 |
135 |
- |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
- |
8 |
8 |
10 |
9 |
2nd Week |
- |
- |
20 |
22 |
26 |
- |
- |
135 |
128 |
130 |
- |
- |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
8 |
9 |
11 |
3rd Week |
- |
- |
22 |
20 |
26 |
- |
- |
135 |
133 |
130 |
- |
- |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
7 |
12 |
13 |
4th Week |
- |
- |
22 |
20 |
24 |
- |
- |
137 |
135 |
137 |
- |
- |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
6 |
12 |
12 |
5th Week |
- |
- |
24 |
18 |
24 |
- |
- |
138 |
137 |
130 |
- |
- |
3.6 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
6 |
12 |
12 |
6th Week |
- |
- |
22 |
20 |
24 |
- |
- |
132 |
133 |
130 |
- |
- |
3.7 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
9 |
12 |
11 |
Table – IV: Survival Period, Postmortum
Findings and Cause of Death
Dog No. |
Length of
Survival |
Postmortum
Findings |
Cause of Death |
1 |
3 DAYS. |
Peritoneal cavity
was full of foul smelling fluid. The intestines were friable left urete was lying free in peritoneal cavity |
Chemical
Peritonitis. |
2 |
6 DAYS. |
Ulcer around cuteneous stoma present. Peritoneal cavity was full of
pus and faecal matter. Intestinal anastomosis was opend. At
mesenteric boreder. |
Faecal Peritonitis. |
3 |
45 DAYS. |
Ulcer around cuteneous stoma was present. Adhesions were present
between peritoneum kidneys and ureter and
intestines. Kidneys and urete were normal in size
and shape. |
Sacrificed |
4 |
45 DAYS. |
Ulcer around cuteneous stoma was present. Adhesions were present
between peritoneum kidneys and ureter and
intestines. Kidneys and urete were normal in size
and shape. |
Sacrificed |
5 |
45 DAYS. |
Ulcer around cuteneous stoma was present. Adhesions were present
between peritoneum kidneys and ureter and
intestines. Kidneys and ureters were normal in size
and shape. |
Sacrificed |
Berman et. al. (1979) studied the skin around stomal area in 76 patients with ileal
conduit diversion and found superficial erosive dermatitis in 27 cases. In 10
cases the area was showing hyperplastic, papillomatous skin lesion of chronic nature.
The stenosis of stoma can be
prevented by (i) Proper site selection prior to
operation and removing a whole circular button of tissue including all laters of anterior abdominal wall (skin to peritoneum),
(ii) Daily finger dilation postoperatively, (iii) Keeping the urine acidified
by avoiding fruit juices, prescribing ascorbic acid and use of acetic acid into
the appliance prior to bed time. The use of 5 gms. Of
aspirin in the appliance effectively made the urine acidic, reduces foul odour, reduces plagues, bleeding and encrustation, (iv)
Proper hygiene of appliance is important.
To increases the diameter of ileum for stoma formation
V-Z plasty is helpful. The stomal
stenosis can be corrected by excising a rim of skin
and refashioning of the distal end of conduit to remove scar (Derrick et. al.
1972), Price et. al. (1973) advise preconditioning of the peristomal
skin 3 to 6 days prior to operation. A appliance face plate of appropriate size
is cementad to the patients intect
skin and patient is asked to remove and reapply it once every 3 days. So the
patient and family gets adopted to the appliance.
In the present study the peristomal
skin excoriation occurred in 100 percent cases but stomal
stenosis did not occur in any case probably because
of proper excision of all layers of anterior abdominal wall.Cordonier
et.al. (2) Reported that stomal stenosis
is more common in paediatric age group because of
greater sensitivity o skin and small size of ileum.An
ill fitting appliance, alkanity of urine, neglect and
poor hygiene of patient increase the incidence of stomal
stenosis.
20 percent dogs of present series died of uretero-intestinal leak. This is one of the common
complication reported by various aurthors as follows:
-
Burnham and Ferror, (3) 15.0%
Jaffe et. al., (4) 2.8
%
Kafetsiouslie and Swinney,(5) 6.9.0%
Harbach et. al.,(6) 5.7
%
Demeterious et. al., (18) 16.0%
The ureteroileal leak was
suspected by the reduced amount of urine/24 hours and gradually setting
peritonitis. The 20% incidences are similar to results reported by Burnham and Ferror, 1960 and Osmetrius et al,
1979.
20 percent dogs of this series developed intestinal anastomotic leakage at mesenteric border, leading to faecal peritonitis and death. It is probably because of
faulty technique. 60 percent dogs of present series survived the full period of
observation. There were no abnormal findings seen on postmartum.
Blood urea, serum electrolytes and urinary chlorides were within normal limit
in all living dogs.
All the preoperative sterile urine became infected
postoperatively and was showing E. coli and proteus
organism. Our observations are similar to Spence B. et al (19) who reported 94
percent positive culture from ileal conduits in dogs
and concluded that a dilated upper urinary tract has much higher positive
bacterial culture than a nondialated tract.
CONCLUSION:
The operative procedure on an average lasted for three
hours and six minutes. 80% of dogs developed cutaneous
ulcer all around the ileostoma stoma. 40% dogs died
in the period of observation. On autopsy one dog died of intestinal anastomotic keak while one dog
died of ureteroileal leak. In rest of three dogs the
diversion was found to be working efficiently.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors express their cordial thanks to Mr. Anand Singh Kanwar,
Lab-Technician, Dept. of Community Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Jagdalpur (C.G.) for his neat and excellent typing.
REFERENCES:
1.
Bricker, E.M. 1960 Experimental study of the
techniques of ureteroileal anastomosis,
J. Urol.; 83; 612.
2.
Shoemarker, 1912 Cited by Melnikoff, A. E. J. Urol.; 105; 892.
3.
Seiffert, 1935 Cited from
J. Urol.; 101; 508.
4.
Garg Narendra K. Evaluation of the impact of emesis and emesis
plus purgation therapy; Research J. Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics: 2 (2)
March – April 2010; 201-202.
5.
Cordonnier,J.J. 1968; Ileal conduit in children. Urol. Int. 23:82. Feminella, J.G.
and Lattimer, J.K. 1971 A retrospective analysis of
70 cases of cutaneous ureterostomy.
J. Urol. 106; 538.
6.
Burnham, J.P. and Farrer.
1960: A group experience with ureteroileal cutaneous anastomosis for urinary
diversion, results and complication of the isolated ileal
conduit in 96 patients. J. Urol. 83: 612.
7.
Jaffe, B.M. and Bricker, E.M. 1968; Surgical
complication of ileal segment urinary diversion .Ann.Surg. 167; 367.
8.
Kafetsioulis, A. and Swinney, J. 1968: Urinary diversion by ileal
conduoit – Along term follow up. Brit. J. Urol.;
40:1.
9.
Harbach, L.B. 1970;
Experiments in ureterosigmoidostomy transuretero ureterostomy
combined with ureteosigmoidostomy to allow a single ureterocolic anastomosis. J.Urol. 104: 395.
10.
Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1993) knowledge, Belief and Practice: A
study of Tribal mothers about feeding of infants; Tribal Health Bulletine (ICMR); Vol. – 2, No. – 3 and 4: 1-2.
11.
Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1993) effectiveness of ICDS in child care
in Rural and Tribal areas of Chhattisgarh (M.P.) J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol. – 6, No.-B (Science) 61-65.
12.
Bansal A.K. and Saxena V.B.(2000) impact of I.C.D.S. on Pregnancy pattern
of Tribal and Non Tribal women. J. Ravi Shankar uni;
Vol. – 13, No.-B (Science) 54-58.
13.
Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1993) utilization of Health Care delivery
by Tribal and Non Tribal women of an ICDS block (1993) J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol.-6, No.-B (Science) 57-60.
14.
Bansal A.K., Agarwal Ashok K. and Govila A.K.
(1998-99) Status of girl child amongst Tribal and Non Tribal in the unreached
rural India; J. Ravi Shankar uni; Vol. – 11-12, No.-B
(Science) 31-36.
15.
Bansal A.K. and Agarwal A.K. (1994) impact of training the knowledge of
Tribal and Non Tribal Anganwade workers; J. Ravi
Shankar uni; Vol. – 7, No.-B (Science) 51-54.
16.
Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. (1997) Immunization status of Tribal and
Non Tribal Children of Raipur district, Madhya Pradesh; Tribal Health Bulletin
(ICMR) Vol. – 3, No.-2; 12-14.
17.
Bansal A.K. and Chandorkar R.K. Impact of I.C.D.S. on morbidity due to
Nutritional deficiency Diseases amongst Tribe and Non Tribe Children; Research
J Science and Tech.; 2009: 1(2); 82-84.
18.
Demetrius, h. Bagley and Wayne, Glazier. ; 1979
Retroperitoneal drainage of ureterointestinal
conduits. . Urol. 12: 271.
19.
Spence, B. and Esho, J.
1973 Bacteriuria in intestinal eonduit
urinary diversion in dogs. Exc. Med. Urol. Nephro. 7;
478.
Received on 11.02.2011
Modified on 12.03.2011
Accepted on 15.04.2011
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research J.
Science and Tech. 3(3): May-June. 2011: 169-172